I have questioned some failures of our local governments and their boards,
committees, and appointees here in Cheboygan that are part of our local
culture. Culture is a confusing word and a New Yorker op-ed piece a few years
ago delved into Merriam-Webster’s 2014 Word of the Year “Culture”. As with many
words, culture, cult, and cultivated all have their roots, appropriately, in
Latin. Raymond Williams was quoted, “Each time we use the word
“culture,” we incline toward one or another of its aspects: toward the
“culture” that’s imbibed through osmosis or the “culture” that’s learned at
museums, toward the “culture” that makes you a better a person or the “culture”
that just inducts you into a group.”
What is the culture that causes
a group of individuals to exercise the same behavior repeatedly? Is it behavior absorbed by osmosis, learned,
or a part of induction into the group? I ask this rhetorical question of the
Tuscarora Downtown Development Authority. This DDA Board, with members chosen
by Tuscarora Supervisor Mike Ridley, consists of eight appointees and himself.
If Mike Ridley, the ball
player, were choosing a basketball team, some like-minded 6’5” players might serve
him well. Supervisor Mike Ridley should
theoretically recommend as DDA appointees a diverse group of individuals
representing differing viewpoints and opinions. Instead, the majority of his
appointed DDA members mirror the mindset of their master. That is the worst-case
definition of political appointees. Mindless zombies that march relentlessly
forward while making faces and snarling at members of the public brave or
foolish enough to attend a DDA meeting. Most of us would be less critical if
that mindless march moved Indian River closer to a measureable goal. Can a
group that after several years of discussion failed to find and set a decorative
“rock” to display a DNR plaque be able to prioritize the spending of hundreds
of thousands of taxpayer dollars?
At a Special Meeting on May 29, 2014 with the
“official” minutes only identifying a “quorum stands for DDA”, an apparent
joint session of like-minded people, the DDA and the Marina Park Committee
worked in cooperation to build the infamous back-in parking at the same time
the Trailhead parking lot was completed. With nine-member board, a quorum would
require at least five attendees. The DDA Board members identified as attendees
by name, Cindy Poquette, Dan Nivelt, and Diana Mallory were part of the alleged
“quorum” that approved spending $87,750 without the accountability of a roll
call vote. Ignoring common knowledge that money spent cannot be used as a match
prior a grant application approval; these three identified people foolishly wasted
your tax dollars. We still drive by that failure every day.
TDA's Dumb, Dumber, and ... Failed Back-In Parking |
On August 21, this
past Monday, I asked the current DDA Chair Dawn Bodnar who had actually attended
the May 29th Special Meeting and voted “all in favor” to spend
$87,750. Ms Bodnar and Diana Mallory made faces and Ms Bodnar said, “this is
public comment; we do not answer questions”.
Did the present DDA Board
learn from that $87,750 mistake? Would the DDA throw out years of Streetscape design
work with tens of thousands of dollars spent and start over from scratch? Supervisor
Mike Ridley made his decision and the DDA Board followed. The DDA drafted an
RFP, a request for bids that asked for “preliminary plans and drawings that
will serve as a RFP for complete engineering and design plans”. “Price should
include any revisions the DDA deems necessary in order to meet their approval”.
This vague, open-ended request “any revisions the DDA deems necessary” wording
resulted in inquiries from interested firms seeking clarification or declining
to bid. Only one firm that employs Mike Ridley’s son responded with a very
limited proposal; a conceptual design, public meeting, and schematic drawings
at cost of $37,000 to $41,000. It was not what the RFP sought. With Mike Ridley
offering only the one bid, he then recused himself and his DDA zombies
attempted to approve that single bid on July 24th without even
reading the proposal.
Mike Ridley had kept some of the
DDA members ignorant for more than a year of an offer addressed personally to
him in June 2016 by the original design firm to revise the engineering plans
already completed, eliminate the back-in parking, and meet the standards the
Road Commission needs. That proposal to correct the completed design was only $11,650.
The Road Commission Board publicly concurred it would be much smarter to tweak
the existing design rather than to throw it all out.
With this information now public, there is
the appearance of deliberate acts by Mike Ridley to ignore his fiduciary
responsibility and narrow the bidders to one firm that coincidentally employs
his son.
S Straits After 18 Years of DDA Improvements |
The DDA board, short a few heads, just approved that sole bid by a 4
to 1 vote. Can we allow Mr Ridley to start a complete re-do of the DDA Streetscape
design process to employ a firm that he has already declared as a personal conflict
of interest?